>I am reading more about the case and now my blood is boiling. Not even the jurors who narrowly acquitted her seem to believe her, they just decided the case wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt. No convicting forensic evidence was presented. And so she skates.
>
>What kind of parent doesn't report her 2 year old daughter missing for a month?
>
>This is about the most despicable crime imaginable, killing your own child so you can have more fun time for yourself. She had a tattoo saying something like livin' la vida loca added to her body after her daughter died. Grrrr....

And it's a death penalty case and you consistantly whine about death penalty and how maybe there will be some chance of a doubt.

This is your fault.

I will say the case did not appear to have been proven absolutely, but it's close enough for me.


>
>
>>She lied during questioning. Her defense lawyer practically admitted that. My bet, her sentence is time served.
>>
>>>>Not guilty
>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43636855/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
>>>
>>>I have not followed the trial at all closely, so take this with a grain of salt. What I don't get is that she was convicted of giving false statements but found innocent of the killing. Why would you lie about a crime you didn't commit?