>Yes. At least this one I know the meaning of. Don't sweat the other translation. I do have is stashed though for a future time :-)

OK, and I see we've gotten into rampaging italics for re-quotes.;-)

>I'm think he'd be pleased. But, then, if you subclassing, I guess it's not purebred anymore, is it?

Well, the horse, of course, is a subclass of the mammal, and would have it's own additional properties, such as l_thoroughbred.:-)