>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/29/no-new-data-does-not-blow-a-gaping-hole-in-global-warming-alarmism/
>
>Doug

So let me see if I follow this.

A paper is published in a peer reviewed journal.
A blog says it's wrong and offers zero proof and ad hominem attacks

Isn't this exactly what the Hockey Team accused the Holoc...I mean AGW "deniers" of doing for years before their pal-reviewed, "green" business funded, phony study citing, claptrap was exposed for the egregiou$ lie that it is?

;)

ps: I see Gavin has been kind enough to post. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/07/misdiagnosis-of-surface-temperature-feedback/. Let's see how that debate develops...and by see I mean look to any other site besides RealClimate because they filter their comments with a weed-eater (look at the # jumps)

Have a great weekend!