> >>Just got my latest version of PC
> Mag that rated the best 50 products of 1996.
> >>
> >>MS Access and Lotus Approach won for databases. That was gall enough to
> start. But then to say that MS Acess was the "most powerful database on
> the market" was absurd.
> >>
> >>Why is it that VFP never gets its due in the PC Journals. Is it that MS
> doesn't want to put any bad press on Access and thus taint MS Office?
> >>
> >>Clearly VFP is more flexible, faster, and more powerful than Access.
> >
> > maybe we should send some emails to the PC Mag editors to let them know
> our opinion... and help promote the product we like (no MS, no need to
> thanks us (g) )
> >
> >I am going to write such a letter, what do u think ?
> >
> >
> >Arnon
>
> Yes, please do that. There are too many CEO's out there who think Access &
> Basic are better than VFP.
>
I agreed too. VFP should step in and say "I'm better than Access..."
More people should know this news.