Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Backup file name vs backup name
Message
 
 
À
11/08/2011 09:00:40
John Baird
Coatesville, Pennsylvanie, États-Unis
Information générale
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Catégorie:
Copies de sauvegarde
Versions des environnements
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2005
Divers
Thread ID:
01520511
Message ID:
01520796
Vues:
34
>>>>>>>>>1. You should be able to change that file name and chose a place for backup. (just click on Add button to specify your own name)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>2. This name essentially means nothing (e.g. it's not important).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Generate the script from SSMS and look at it and compare with the BOL syntax.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Whenever someone says that "this is not important for you to know" I tend to focus on these things more <bg>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>For some reason I remember either seeing or reading somewhere that the .bak contains all backups created for the database. I was just wondering how (if becomes necessary) I can restore this or that specific back.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What is BOL?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thank you for your help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>BOL is Books Online and this is the HELP for SQL Server. Everytime you need to understand some command or how to do something, start from reading Books Online (BOL) and only after you read it, you may ask a clarifying question. BOL usually explains everything in great details, say,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187510.aspx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thank you very much!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>How dare you ask a question before you read the BOL and understand it..... :)
>>>>
>>>>I thought it was a reasonable suggestion, at least reading it and trying to understand it (shrug).
>>>
>>>It wasn't worded as a suggestion, but as an order.... if you need to understand a command, read the BOL and only after that may you ask a question...
>>
>>Fair enough. I didn't take it that way but can see how someone might.
>>
>>I do like it better when there's a sense that the person who asks a question here has tried to solve it on their own first and then comes here when they're stuck. It shouldn't be a first resort when the answer is readily available in the documentation. JOMO....
>
>then that would apply to about 80% of the questions asked here which could have been answered by a 30 second bing search...

I don't know about that 80%. It seems high to me, although of course I have no data to back that up ;-) There are a lot of difficult issues posted here and it is sometimes clear the poster has spent time trying to figure it out on their own.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform