Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
YAQ on using Having clause
Message
 
 
À
Tous
Information générale
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Catégorie:
Syntaxe SQL
Titre:
YAQ on using Having clause
Versions des environnements
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2005
Divers
Thread ID:
01521114
Message ID:
01521114
Vues:
81
Suppose I have the following SQL Select:
select SUM(FIELD1) AS FIELD1, SUM(PODET.ITEM_QUANT) AS ITEM_QUANT, SUM(POREC.REC_QTY) AS REC_QTY,  POREC.PODET_PK FROM POREC RIGHT 
JOIN PODET ON PODET.PODET_PK = POREC.PODET_PK 
GROUP BY  PODET.PODET_PK 
HAVING SUM(POREC.REC_QTY) < SUM(Podet.ITEM_QUANT) > 0
What if all values of REC_QTY are NULL, what would be the SUM( REC_QTY )? In my test it works, that is, the SQL creates a query. But I am not sure if it is accurate.

I tried to change the HAVING to something like this:
HAVING CASE SUM(POREC.REC_QTY) IS NULL THEN SUM(PODET.ITEM_QUANT)>0 ELSE 
SUM(POREC.REC_QTY < SUM( PODET.ITEM_QUANT) END
But I get error. I suppose I can't use IS NULL with SUM(), Correct?
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform