>>>>Well, we were quite well-off for some time in Bolivia, WITHOUT the hassles of DST. Starting September 1, we now have DST, too - for the first time in Bolivian history, I believe. Regular Bolivian time is UTC minus 4, we'll now have UTC minus 3 while DST lasts.
>>>>
>>>>I checked the Wikipedia article on DST, and there is considerable doubt on whether it actually saves anything. According to some studies, it saves energy, some studies say that actually MORE energy is used (due to increased heating costs), and some say it doesn't make much difference, one way or the other.
>>>
>>>I doubt that DST has some real effect now.
>>>Esp. if you take the other problems in account like depressions, sleepless, lost of efficiency at work till your biological clock is set :-)
>>>
>>>Maybe this was true when it was first presented, but now...
>>>BTW Russia canceled time change this year.
>>>From now on they will not change to summer and winter time :-)
>>
>>In the UK it always comes down to Scottish farmers. Why can't they have their own time.
>
>You joke but we have a state, Indiana, which can't even agree on what time to follow. Part of the state is on Eastern ("fast") time and other parts are on Central ("slow") time. It isn't even geographic. Basically each town takes its pick. Many years ago I had an internship at the Evansville Press and we had a giant map of Indiana on the wall, with fast time locations in one color and slow time in a different color. That way you could make a better guess whether someone you wanted to talk to was in the office yet or not. (This was before cell phones; as my daughters will cheerfully tell you, I am very, very old).

Arizona is another interesting one - they don't have DST - except in the national parks (I guess because it's considered federal land as opposed to state land??). We have no DST here in Hawaii - but I don't know about the national parks here.