Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Choosing a pad
Message
De
07/09/2011 08:28:38
 
 
À
07/09/2011 08:24:16
Dragan Nedeljkovich (En ligne)
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
Information générale
Forum:
Android
Catégorie:
Autre
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
01522645
Message ID:
01522884
Vues:
41
I can find many instances of soldiers Dragan

http://www.guardian.co.uk/search?q=soldiers§ion=


>>>>There should be a default but omitted noun, just like we say Češka, Poljska and Turska for Czech, Poland and Turkey - all of them adjectives, but with an assumed noun (country) to them. Somehow I expect "the military" to be a plural, just like "the poor".
>>>>
>>>>Soldiers?
>>>
>>>There is no plural of soldier. There are only troops, remember? Soldiers is not politically correct (don't ask me why).
>>>
>>
>>Soldiers is not a plural of soldier? You've lost me there.
>
>Count the newspaper reports from the current wars for the last ten years where they were deployed or died as such. I have only seen "8 troops", never "8 soldiers". One soldier, two troops, three troops... and of course, they didn't even have the time to update the dictionaries, where a troop is still defined only as a group of several members - military or theatrical or dancing.
>
>>>>I don't actually have a problem with "the military" as a collective noun there.
>>>
>>>Neither have I, with using an adjective as a subject, as long as there is an implied noun. In this case, it's a military... what?
>>
>>"The military" can be a noun. I am sure many more people think of it as a noun than as an adjective.
>>You wouldn't be obstinate with us, would you? ;-)
>
>Nope, this is just when my Latin becomes an obstacle. To me, it's an adjective, like medical, practical, educational etc - an adjective with clear traces of derivation from a noun (miles/militis, medicus, praxis, educatio). And in English, when you use an adjective with the definite article, it means plural (the unwashed, the dispossessed). So it still does not feel like a noun to me. I know it is used as one (just like "musical" is - nobody know what was the noun behind it - musical what, cheese? - but it is a de facto noun now), it just goes against my grain a bit.
>
>BTW, you may like this: http://ndragan.com/lange/apearls.html . It's still in diapers, but just as other lists I make, it will grow over the years.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform