General information
Category:
Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF)
>Hi Viv,
>
>hmmm, What does this mean?
>
>> with WPF, you should never use base classes to impose any visual appearance on derived classes.
Well, put it this way: I can't think of any reason why you would do so when you can use Styles or Control Templates; hard-coding appearance by using a base class pretty much negates those benefits of XAML.....
TBH, since I work a lot with MVVM, I can't think of many reasons to define behaviour within the base class of a visual object either....
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only