>>Why not? How do you explain it otherwise?
>
>Here I am partially with Gregory: linear small steps smell more like
>walking a longer list with empty handles,
>adding to an evergroing string and trimming at the end
>or similar things. When memory is used up you will run into queries
>taking 10000* as long, because there is no more memory left to build a rushmore bitmap.
>Program will continue to work - but sloooowly ;-)
>
>>And also, what is the simple test to see if the memory is leaking or not?
>Evergrowing sys(1104) return values. Also Calvin has on his blogsite some routines showing the
>allocation of the process memory - can be found in one of the sysmetrics offerings as well.
>
>You are EXPLICITLY advised to add such logging to your error handler
>
>HTH
>
>thomas

Can you post the exact reference? I'll add memory value saving to the output of invoke.