>>I have absolutely no idea what the lat/lons are in your code samples. If they're some sort of military grid system you'll need to convert them to conventional lat/lon.
>
>Looks like that's the longitude/lattitude in feet (measured from equator and prime meridian, I guess). These, divided with the radius (in feet) would give the angle in radians. And that would fit nicely with the rest of measurements being in feet. But then... how is the distance from the prime meridian taken - at equator, at the current lattitude, or as a distance from the (0,0) point?
>
>But then, this seems like the Australian maps where the south pole is on top... I mean, just guessing that these are coordinates in Tc's neighborhood, then these would be north and west, so... the numbers for the west should be negative.
>
>This is not the first time I've seen this - someone at the source of these data is so youesscentric that they have mirrored the coordinates so the horizontal axis has the negative semiaxis on the right, and the positive one on the left...

They are in negative, but I have the values in state plane - I was tired and burned out I guess because it just dawned on me this morning!

So:
1713881.3750,833601.8125 = 36.0365602, -079.9677260

Now I just have to find the code to convert back