You've got a point. Repetitions. But that is not an iPhone problem. Eventually it'll apply to the Windows Phone (when there are apps for it) and Android also.

As for iTunes its not perfect. But it's not as bad as you try to make it look.

Sorry on this one but I'm replying to something else you mentioned in that thread. You mentioned that Google read our e-mails. You have a link to prove that. You mean only gMail? You said you could go on about Google. Please tell us more. I find those very interesting.

>OK, how many note taking apps do you need? How many calorie counters? How many flashlights? Same concept.
>
>No, I would not buy a brick from Microsoft unless it applied it's own mortar and layed itself. And then, only if I needed a brick that did that. And if the price was right. iTunes is not an excuse. I have no need for an application that's as bad as iTunes when there are others that do a great job and do it better. (but then, better is an opinion)
>
>
>>You should stop mentioning fart apps. Perhaps those that are unaware of what is an iPhone will find it funny. But for those that use an iPhone you just prove your ignorance of what is in the AppStore. Then again perhaps there should be more fart apps available for the Windows Phone. This way MS could do marketing saying there lots of apps available for the Windows Phone ;-)
>>
>>I'm beginning to believe that the iTunes argument is just a lame excuse. You prefer to say that than to say "Even if MS released a brick and called it a phone I'd buy it"