>Hello,
>
>We use version numbering for our VFP executables:
>
>3.14
>3.15
>etc.
>
>We always used only two digits for the second number, but the numbers increase too quickly. I wonder if there is a rule how many digits the second number should be, I did not want to use a third number, because then I would need to change some logic that we created many years ago. So could I create versions like
>3.140
>3.141
>3.142
>etc?

How about using Revision number -- especially if you're trying to keep track of differnt builds after bugfix or minor program tweaks.