>>>>I assume you mean Newt? Why do you describe him as disgraced?
>>>
>>>PMFJI. I would not call him disgraced at all. But it was pretty hypocritical to seek Clinton's impeachment over an affair at the same time he himself was having an affair. Newt was still with wife #2 and carrying on with the woman who would become wife #3 (and remains the incumbent).
>>
>>PMFJIOYJI (on your jump in) ;)
>>
>>Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice.
>>
>>Jumping back out...
>
>PMFJIOYPMFJI
>
>Clinton left your country in a reasonable state and was (on the whole) not a bad President. despite his personal failings (which in a grown up country would have gone relatively unnoticed).
>Personally I elect people for their fiscal, defense and social policies not what they do with their dick. Newt might not be a bad choice actually, he's been round long enough to have acquired some pragmatism.

A minor caveat. Clinton was a good president once he lost the House and Senate in 1994. That resulted in him pivoting towards the center and governing with the opposition party to affect major important changes. Though he left us in recession, it was minor and we would move quickly through it thanks in large part to him not getting in the way of the economy.