Nancy says there's a place to put suggestions. Let's go fill up his mailbox. :)

Seriously, though, is there even going to be a new version? The stuff I saw on the navigator was all dated '97. That seems like a long time between versions if someone's actually working on it.

I think, if the UT doesn't object to accessing twice, I'm going to have open my browser and the navigator. Then I can have the speed plus the real-time too.

-Michelle


>Just started using it myself about a week ago. Even though I'm online all day I find it faster navigating through the hundreds of messages with the Navigator. However (excuse me while I whine a bit) the interface is REALLY slow. Just launching/closing screens has slow response. I can see building the tree control with hundreds of messages taking awhile, but not loading/unloading screens.
>
>Also wished the ListBox that houses the message list was resizable. It really is a bummer viewing a small portion of the message list while the ListBox housing the message view is large and resizable (by resiziing the form). Also, it would be nice to only have the tree control display folders that I'm interested in seeing. At the very least I wish it didin't expand the whole message tree everytime I do a refresh on messages.
>
>While I'm at it, how about an interface to the UT archives in here somewhere?
>
>You're right about the mail response too. There's no quick and easy way in Ut Nav (that I know of) to alert me to new mail messages.
>
>Ok, I'll stop now. Boy it's nice to play the user game from the other side every once in awhile. Kinda theraputic!
>
>
>>Ok, got it working. It's kind of nice, but I don't know if I'm going to keep using it. It's great for offline reading, but I usually am online all day, anyway. I miss having it notify me when someone has replied to me. And there's no HTML in the messages, either.
>>
>>I'd like it better if it was more real-time when you're online. I'd like it to keep going out and getting new messages automatically and tell me when I have a message.
>>
>>Well, I'll give it a try...
>>
>>-Michelle