>>Although I was quite clear before, allow me to unravel your contextual twist.
>JR>The gist is that concern about income distribution is a sign of jealousy,
>>No. Specific to the occupy movement...
>
>Here's what you said:
>
>>>This whole income distribution distraction boils down to jealousy and the Occupy movement has solidified that.
>
>Occupy is presented as an examplar of your wider blunderbuss that captures the "whole income distribution distraction" as you label it. Unless "distraction" isn't just another pejorative but has a new contextual twist definition.
>
>>>Both assertions remain accurate when taken in their proper context.
>
>The context is slating of interest in income distribution on the grounds of jealousy before denying and revising. That's boring, as it is if you cast your views as definitions that you then insist are a proof of those views. Time to leave it here.

Yup. And with no hard feelings.