I give readers here more credit than that. Does anyone here really need to be told that no suggestion offered is perfect for all scenarios? The OP asked for feedback on the comparison of products and other recommendations. Responders offer their experiences. Other responders can agree or disagree as per their experiences.

>I was not trying to accuse you of a heinous crime, I guess what I was trying to get at was that when you recommend or offer a suggested approach, if you are going to state the positives then do the recipient the kindness of also stating the negatives. Otherwise it comes across as "this is the best greatest way ooh boy do this yeah".

That is your perception.


>>>We are big fans of terminal services here, we have 8 TS in live production. But once again I must point out that just telling people whatever you do is great is not always the entire story.
>>
>>Tuvia, I am not telling people what I do is great or suggesting it is the entire story. We are all offering possible suggestions, alternatives and solutions in response to a question - it doesn't mean that those opinions are be-all-and-end-all suggestions or that they exclude other options or combination of options. They are offered just as suggestions and possible avenues that the original poster can explore. I expect people to chime in their different views and experiences and that adds value to the general discussion.
>>
>>>TS runs only windows apps. Also there is limited to no support for connecting to a TS from non-windows clients. RDP is by design a MS protocol they wish to keep as a MS protocol. There are RDP clients for other platforms, but they are unsupported by MS. Printing is also an issue, and the CAL's become pretty expensive if the app grows.
>>
>>There are solutions, options and compromises depending on the application specifics.
>>
>>> ... but every choice has pros and cons.
>>
>>That goes without saying.