>>Thank you for the explanation; this is now coming back. So I suppose I need to make it a field and not a property.
>
>
>
>You have implemented it as a field.
>
>A property has get/set accessors
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/w86s7x04.aspx>
>
>But since it is readonly - I would just leave it as a field
>
This is exactly what I plan to do. I just mixed in my head the term field and property. But I remember that the property needs to have Set Get methods; I think <g>.
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
