>>>Read the studies.... they are divided just about 50%... most of the scientists for it are receiving huge grants to study a made up phenomenon and have a conflict of interest in perpetuating the rouse in order to make more money.. like I said Gore is the poster child of junk science.... I know you won't bother to check the facts since you already have made up your mind, but they are there if you look with an open mind....
>>
>>What studies?
>>
>>According to Wikipedia there is "a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change"
>>
>>Also and old article in Science Magazine says there is consensus, and there are many many more, did not find any claim that the opinion is divided 50/50.
>
>
>wow! wikipedia? really? lmao.. here is just one: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=1964

And here is a link to your link. There is nothing non-partisan about the NCPA. They are one of those groups whose innocuous sounding names disguise a definite POV. Take a look the list of their major funders, which includes the Koch brothers and Exxon Mobil.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=National_Center_for_Policy_Analysis