Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
FoxWeb, AFP, WWWC, and ActiveVFP
Message
 
À
17/01/2012 04:23:21
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Applications Internet
Divers
Thread ID:
01531947
Message ID:
01533188
Vues:
62
Hi

I will have a better feel for the performance after I get a little further into my project. However, the only time delay that I have experienced so far is the initial load time after that everything so far happens very quickly. I have opted for a VFP technique of only loading controls when the form or tab page is activated. I don't know if I needed to do this but I got so use to doing it in VFP that I just carried it over to QooxDoo figuring it could not hurt.

The area of tweaking for me has been in the data binding area. They have a relatively simple but powerful method of data binding but I wanted to make it more automatic so I have built this into my base classes so it just happens after I assign the equivalent of a "ControlSource". I also am now building support for parent child relationships so that when I change the selection in the parent list all the child items get refreshed as well.

Simon


>Hi Simon,
>
>>QooxDoo is turning out to be quite understandable ... So I have built similar data binding in QooxDoo so it is simply a matter of specifying a JSON Store (similar to a VFP table) and a column name (similar to a VFP field) and the framework takes care of loading and saving the values.
>
>I just went over there again and read news about the JS-based backend LIBERATED (upper case their choice..)
>Have not looked at their data access layer or anything else yet - if you use it and find the time, pls. give your impressions.
>
>I also horsed a bit around and loaded their demo pages again into different CPU/browser settings -
>workable on even on not too current HW, worse but not really bad on android-1Ghz Tegra2,
>but also not really fast on current HW - so I guess much of the snap factor might be connected to DL/latency factors,.
>which might depend on their backend as I don't think my 16000 DL is the bottleneck.
>No big differences when using current browsers in "felt snappines" on the I5 pc.
>
>Do you log the time between user input and "inputready again" times within your fwk ?
>If so, what is your time "acceptable" limit and do you have to tweak things to reach it /
>how hard/successful is tweaking ? In what areas do need you tweak ?
>
>tia
>
>thomas
Simon White
dCipher Computing
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform