Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Another cop hitting protester who's lying on ground
Message
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
Articles
Divers
Thread ID:
01534171
Message ID:
01534532
Vues:
41
>>>>>Another one....
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq4yGWipyBk&feature=autoplay&list=PL963187D07F4AAE24&lf=results_main&playnext=2
>>>>>
>>>>>You couldn't stop him. He was something else.
>>>>>
>>>>>Like you, I was fortunate enough to see him in the old Boston Garden during his reign. He was just unbelievable. I have been to lots of sports events and have never heard anything louder than the roar in the old Garden when he would rush the puck up the ice. Deafening. It's not exaggerating to say he revolutionized the game.
>>>>
>>>>Not necessarily for the better though. It's one thing to play like that and actually be Bobby Orr, but after Orr everybody wanted to score goals and the concept of a true defenseman pretty much went the way of high button shoes. I used to love to watch Allan Stanley, Dickie Moore, Doug Harvey, Red Kelly and guys like that play defense. It was an art. An art that largely disappeared after Orr changed the role of the defenseman. Like I said, the rest of them were not Bobby Orr.
>>>
>>>Yeah, fair point. He was one of a kind. The average defenseman -- if a guy good enough to make the NHL can ever be described as average -- trying to score goals is going to be a sieve back on his own end. Like you, I appreciate the defenders who stay home and lock up their end of the ice.
>>
>>I think it's probably a major part of the reason why back then, being a 20 goal scorer meant something, and now everybody and his mother is a 20 goal scorer.
>
>That's going pretty far back. Wayne Gretzky had his best days in the 1980s, which is going back a way. Granted, he was as much a special case as Orr, but he AVERAGED 200 points a season for about four years.
>
>Bill K. and I were discussing who was better, Orr or Gretzky. That's a choice I never want to make. What's wrong with just feeling fortunate to have seen both of them? Mantle or Mays, Russell or Wilt, Brown or Sayers, on and on. It's missing the point to decide one is "only" the second best ever.
>

Orr was a 2 way player. He was a defenseman - best in the league. And he was better than most forwards while he was at it.

He could outskate anyone (anyone!). Some of my best memories of him were when he'd put on 'skating lessons' when the Bruins were shorthanded. He could shag the puck for over a minute killing time, and make his opponents look silly in the process.

His knees went out and he was done way too early.

The Great One was the best forward in history by far. Best passer by far too. Excellent skater.

He wasn't a defenseman at all.

He managed to stay physically intact throughout his long career.

Both were great sportsman and great with the fans.

>Well, here in Chicago we all know Michael Jordan was the best ever ;-)

dq4yGWipyBk
____________________________________

Don't Tread on Me

Overthrow the federal government NOW!
____________________________________
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform