>>> You keep stating that it's less invasive but I don't think that's the case. Come on - which do you think is going to work better - give a child a vaccine to prevent cancer (or smallpox or any of the zillion things wiped out by vaccines) or to criminalize cigarettes?
>
>Exactly. It's more successful/more acceptable to jab a kid or force a bishop to offer contraception against his beliefs than to control a poison. The same people fiercely defending their own right to access poison, often are equally fierce in denying others the right to live by their beliefs or insisting that kids should be jabbed whether mom likes it or not. Do as I say, not as I do?

What I'm saying is that trying to outlaw cigarettes and allowing kids to die because mommy don't like shots is freakn ridiculous and your argument has no merit because it's insanely impractical.