>>>That is a good question. My first reaction is to say yes, why not? Seems like if there was an opportunity to save someone from getting cancer it shouldn't be hindered by someones religions point of view.
>
>What about cigarettes in that case. Making them illegal would avoid lots of cancers and respiratory and cardiovascular disease. I don't think there would be religious objections to that and removing access to poisons is far less invasive than forcing injections on somebody against their will.

Makes perfect sense. But when has making vices illegal ever worked?