>>>>>
>>>>>Personally, I'm all for vaccines that block/stop/eradicate major diseases and (possibly) some cancers. If you don't want your children vaccinated, fine - but your insurance should then have the right to not cover your childen if/when they contract polio, whooping cough, measles, mumps, etc. And no, that's not advocating forced immunizations - it's expecting the ADULTS to accept the consequences of their decisions - and I'll even state now that no, the children don't deserve these diseases, but hey! talk to your parents. They're the ones who made that (un)informed decision.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I agree.
>>>>
>>>>I'd also extend this to say insurance companies should not have to cover people who knowingly take unnecessary risks - ie motorcyclists w/o helmets, drivers w/o seatbelts, etc.
>>>
>>>And smokers.
>>
>>..or anyone who's ever taken what the insurance company considers "poison" - yeah I can see where this would go...."what? You breathed air from a polluted city? Sorry you're no longer covered.."
>
>There is a big difference. BIG!

Agreed. I know that if you are a smoker you pay a higher insurance premium. I also know that insurance companies in general will do anything to avoid paying even when they should.