>>I don't think you can really compare a woman's ability to get healthcare with the choice of to eat a ham sandwich or not.
LOL.
If free contraception is healthcare, then ham sandwich is food.
If denying free contraception is denying healthcare, then denying ham sandwich is denying food.
Denying food is starvation.
Are you really saying it's OK to starve people as long as you provide free contraception?!
You must be, since the sophistry is demonstrably identical in both cases.
;-)
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
