>>>Dmitry,
>>>
>>>I am not having a fight with anyone. I never fight unless I feel threatened and I don't feel any threats here. If I feel threatened then I defend myself, otherwise I simply try to correct any misinformation I see. A comment that says that checking the data type of a property of an object will not protect against an error of "Not an object" is simply untrue. My error, and I did make one here, was answering the direct question about the error and not noticing that the incorrect loop type was being used in the sample code.
>>>
>>>We would have fixed that problem on the next question that would arise about the error being gone but the objects not getting released properly.
>>
>>Janis,
>>
>>The "fight" was in quotes and there was a <g> after it; so take it easy. It was my feeble attempt at a humor (I always wanted to be a bad comedian instead of good developer; so I ended up being an average developer and comedian :)).
>
>Dmitry,
>
>Sorry if my reply seemed like I was unhappy. I didn't take your post wrong, I laughed before I replied. I was smiling when I wrote my reply to you. I thought your comment was really funny.

Thank you for understanding me.