>>>Does anyone think it doesn't suck on a desktop?
>>>
>>>Why in the he77 Microsoft would try to make that a default for an OS that likely targets desktop users is absolutely beyond me.
>>>
>>>The OS itself seems pretty good, but they've Vista'd the interface. I would have expected them to have learned not to throw a crappy interface at people just to be different. Obviously I was wrong.
>>>
>>>Of course even the non-Metro desktop has changed fairly drastically (not Vista'd, but considerably different).
>>>
>>>They should make Metro a non-default installation option - "Do you want a cutesy touch interface or are you using a real computer?"
>>>
>>>Yeah - I've been playing with that and Visual Studio 11 all day.
>>
>>I'm not sure I see it as a desktop interface. Mobile, maybe. I saw a good presentation about it on Saturday. For sure it is a new paradigm.
>
>Phone Metro already works fine. Tablet/POS/etc would work fine.
>
>Desktop or laptop? It's like a giant leap backwards to Win 3.1 or Apple's Finder task switchers (that Apple used to lie about and call it multitasking) except no windows - each Metro app is full screen or switched out and suspended.
>
>With Metro as the default interface I see this as another OS that corporate America (and elsewhere) completely skips for desktop/laptop use.
I don't see it in widespread corporate use any time soon. I do see it as a promising new UI, especially for mobile.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only