>>>>>>In fact the service record of IIS 7 for vulnerabilities has been much better than any of the *nix servers available.
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting... do you have some stats to back that?
>>>>
>>>>A quick bing search on 'iis7 security vs apache' seems to at least put them on equal terms.
>>>
>>>Hmm... on both Bing and Google the first page of results has nothing newer than 2010, most results 2007 - 2009. That's about 1,000 years old in human years < g >
>>
>>And IIS has gone through major overhauls over the last few years - If anything I think the field tilts much more to IIS for security.
>
>IIS 7.5 was apparently released October 2009, 7.0 before that. I believe the major rearchitecting of IIS was going from 5x to 6x, which was quite a while ago.
>
>Coincidentally, Apache 2.0 was released exactly 10 years ago today, but there have been lots of point versions. Wikipedia says the most recent is 2.4.1, released 45 days ago.
>
>So, comparisons of IIS 7.x vs. Apache 2.x may still be relevant even if they're a few years old.
>
>A lot of ISPs are slow to change, NetCraft thinks your site is running on W2K/IIS5:
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://kuhngroup.comThe kuhngroup.com site is hosted at web.com. Dunno what it is running on and never had an issue.
____________________________________
Don't Tread on Me
Overthrow the federal government NOW!
____________________________________