Thomas,

yes I heard about the Android app wrapper (kind of "smart client", as a understand) as well. Lets see what will happen. iOS, at least it runs in the browser, but ther browser solution looks nice too. iOS is importande for the manager that will look at some charts. Most valuable to get it running there. (eg)

I was Feb, 16 in Frankfurt? And no I was on the way to skip the alias ... (^_^)

I put some hope on it. I need to learn something new anyway, but the idea to run it wherever you get java started and use it as long as you can reach the net is a good starter with my customers. Use hardware as you like and scale as you like are not to bad arguments. And it looks like a lot of the general java (script) stuff might be usable.

Lutz

>>the normal client will run as "web client" or as "smart client" (this is bound to a kind of app, not available on Android) or as "API" (they have an other name). Just only one connection per license, thats it.
>
>But they told also that they had an android app client in development, hinting at a release this year.
>While iOS would stay web bound, mostly due to app rules and legalize and to lesser degree for tech reasons.
>
>>Thats what they come out in Frankfurt early this year.
>
>I was the second to last to arrive before the talk started - calculating motorbike drive time and switching over to car
>is not a good idea in biz hours, even if I had probably the shortest drive.
>Agnes should have introduced himself ;-)
>
>>I try to talk the Servoy people to come out with something more understandable. Let's see if they do better then the competitors. (eg)
>
>Some of their thoughts are on the nose, and if you compare Servoy "high end" cost with Lianja
>Lianja seems outrageous for contract devs and hard to sell for high volume companies - especially as
>
>>Just only one connection per license, thats it.
>
>Is not clear from the Lianja site last time I checked, but is neccessary IMHO.
>
>regards
>
>thomas