>But it's ok for a man calling himself a member of the neighborhood watch chasing down, after being told not to by the police, a youth (wearing a 'hoodie') walking back from the store "armed" with Skittles and an Ice Tea, shot and killed him.
>
>That's what it really sounds like you're saying, repeatedly.
>
>Unless what you are trying to say is that the way this case got blown all out of proportion so quickly (one month later) is a sad statement on today's media - which is the point many people of all races have made. Or, asking why THIS case, and not all the other questionable cases that have probably happened since this one that aren't getting national media attention.
>

Lynching was supposedly outlawed in this country many decades ago.

String him up.


>
>
>>>>Yeah. NBC edits the 911 call to make it sound racist. Enter Sharpton and the other lynchers.
>>>>
>>>>Lynching black people is not allowed, but apparently lynching hispanics (Zimmerman is hispanic although they try not to mention that so it sounds more white (you know, racist)) and whites is a real sport for the media.
>>>>
>>>>They'll probably say he didn't vote for OBama too just to really get the racist chant going.
>>>
>>>Bill, seriously.
>>>
>>>I was open minded about a case that quickly became racially polarized. There weren't any witnesses, I said. (Which remains true). I was as annoyed as you when Al Sharpton and other opportunists leaped into the fray. Let's withhold judgment, I said. This is why we have courts.
>>>
>>>Then I started hearing some more things. Like George Zimmerman having called the cops 46 times before about suspicious characters. About him profiling Trayvon Martin specifically and finding him that night. Like pursuing him, with a gun, after calling it in and being specifically told by the cops to let it go, we'll handle it.
>>>
>>>Maybe he is in fact innocent. I am reacting to the facts as they come out.
>>
>>
>>They used to have a law enforcement system and courts for that kinda stuff.
>>
>>Lynching is better, right?