General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
I won't speak to what Craig meant, but I believe the recommended course of action is to: 1) buffer the view cursor; 2) do not explicity open, which therefore makes buffering the table irrelevant; 3) when the view is TABLEUPDATEd, the underlying table will be updated at that time.
That's just my understanding.
>>>Don't buffer the tables when using views, since views are really just a buffer for your tables. If you buffer your tables, you will need to issue 2 TableUpdate(), one for the view (first) and one for the tables (second). It's best just to open the table unbuffered and to issue a single TableUpdate() in the view.
>>>
>>>HTH
>>>
>>
>>I strongly disagree. Use table buffering and things will work well.
>
>Why would you buffer an underlying table when using a view?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only