>>I don't necessarily find this a bad thing. The only winner is a class action suit is the lawyers who make huge piles of cash. You don't need an attorney for small claims court. It's a simple process and takes very little time. If you win, you'll probably end up with more money than you would in a class action suit.
I tend to agree. For bigger companies a class action suit is just a cost, one of many legal events driven by lawyers without too much business distraction. Multiple small claims events in claimants' own jurisdictions would be a complete PITA for MS. Their goal is prior resolution, and where is the victim if that happens? They aren't alone: I can tell you that if you persist past 2 emails in a customer services complaint at a larger company, many have automated systems that will offer you something quite big to settle the matter immediately. Why not- it's cheaper than a lawyer or managing a credit card chargeback or attendance (or non-attendance) at a small claims hearing. The systems are pretty dumb but they do record these things so people can't make a habit of it. ;-)
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1