Script languages are already highly valued in Enterprises, everywhere -- not by IT, perhaps :), but by the workers who make Access apps, excel worksheets that mimic apps, and heaven help us, Word Tables, in order to get their work done. VFP has been a sane alternative in the past; and I think Lianja will be a sane alternative in the future.

best,

Hank

>>That's true for every solution I know of with the exception of Lianja native client:
>
>Now GuiNeu is/was able to run a subset of vfp commands in fxp's in Dotnet - even on mobile...
>Not that I would claim it to be a valid approach for large code basis ;-)
>
>>There are some things it is not intended to do: it will not use VCX's, SCX's, etc., nor run existing VFP reports.
>
>A "porting over" is also in the design of polarfox and is/was with fpw>>vfp ;-))
>
>But such an approach needs higher testing effort -
>one of the main/valid reasons for staying with the vfp code base is sligthly tarnished.
>A lot rests on how wet the bleeding edge is ;-))
>Might make most sense for small or vertical shops having vfp driving the cash cow,
>unless in enterprize the ability to work in different script languages is valued.
>
>regards
>
>thomas