I prefer free and payed software with source included.
I sometimes read Source code as a way to learn - in my free time. (Yeah I know, geeks and their hobbies...)

If there is a need to fix issues in the foreign developed parts, I will get payed -
to a degree a bit more (often framed in very lenient time estimates, sometimes as a bonus)
and also helps if the money source needs to tighten the budget by pruning some devs down the line.

So who is hurt if Source is included ?

>There's a reason I don't use Open Source. I don't want to wade through all that code nor do I have time. I'm too busy creating great solutions for my customers.
>
>>As the source is often not available when using pure MS tools, you have more problems after that point in time -
>>which balances the ease of starting compared to developing your own data access classes.