>>>>>There are various videos floating around. Watch and make your own conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>I repeat - exactly how is involving Iran going to be helpful in this situation?
>>>
>>>It simply would be.
>>>Weather you like them or not, Iran is friendly neighbour of Syria whom they tend to thrust.
>>>So if there was a genuine intention to stop ensuing disaster in Syria (whereas exactly opposite is true! )
>>>then Iran should be among the first countries to consider for such thing.
>>
>>No, Iran is a friendly neighbour of *part* of Syria - the current government, and some of the people.
>
>So you already divided Syria in two ?

No, I'm pretty sure I'm blameless in that matter.

>Iran in the role we are discussing here, would be friendly neighbour to a sovereign state of Syria (only Syria out there) which is currently in turmoil that can easily lead to another long civil war. (Like Lebanon for instance).

Ah yes, Iran, that paragon of compromise. They know all about preventing civil war.

>>Why would Iran want those factions of Syria to do anything different from what they're already doing? Iran is worried about being surrounded by democratic countries, Arab Spring uprisings etc. Iran wants the current regime in Syria to remain as-is.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19fcN3VaXs4&feature=fvwrel

You seem to have a poor opinion of Belgians. Beware - no-one expects the ( UT ) Belgian Inquisition...

>>For similar reasons, Russia doesn't want regime change, either. They want to keep a good arms customer and their naval base at Tartus.
>
>I do not think Russia has problem with democracy. As for bases, sure. It is their property.

LMAO - I was talking about Russia not wanting a regime change in Syria, but I certainly understand why you might think that way :)

19fcN3VaXs4