>>>Are infidel's considered to be 'civilians'?
>
>"People of the Book" certainly are.
>
>BTW, if you consider the root of the word "infidel" it's not difficult to figure who came up with it first. ;-)

The source of the word does not matter. There is most certainly a move by Islam to capture and dominate the planet. I choose to be free and therefore have no interest in being a part of it. For many muslims, my choice of freedom requires that I be killed. A positively foolish stance on their part.

Yes, most muslims are peaceful, but where they become the majority, free governments shall surely fall as they (mostly because of fear of islamic radicals) will vote in muslim candidates who will then cast aside constitutions and declarations of freedom to impose islamic rule through sharia upon all citizens. To me that is repugnant. Considering that immigrant muslims are breeding at rate that is six to one over all other groups in North America, a couple of generations from now, our grand children could be in some serious trouble. I suspect that as populations wake up to this, so far, quiet invasion, racist violence will break out and even increase to civil war status. Look at Detroit. It seems that the more there are the more radical they become. There is a pattern to their behavior and it is based on population strength. The time to alter that bad behavior and thinking pattern is now, before they are in a position to control those who are still free.

Now this is happening in my country.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/07/13/john-baird-canada-will-keep-a-close-eye-on-iranian-embassy-investigate-allegations/