Again, where's the proof? Accusations from another rider who wasn't clean and who's statements were later proven false? The French? Where's the blown tests?

Unless you're going with the 'where there's smoke there MUST be fire' thought process, I'm not seeing how you can know 'Armstrong was guilty through years of denials'


>I really am not bringing any nationalism to this because I knew Armstrong was guilty through years of denials from him. AFAIK he's still denying it.
>
>>"I am a great believer in innocent until proven guilty. So let's say it looks very fishy."
>>
>>LOL thats quite clear then.
>>
>>Lets juts hope she's clean like Lance Armstrong :-)