Actually, it was the waffle fries I was addicted to...the damn waffle fries.

But then again, I haven't eaten at a Chik-Fil-A for about a year and a half, which is when I found out about the donation of money to groups that actively promote discrimination against gays.

And, so I won't (hopefully) get another response stating the same thing, yes it's their money to do with what they choose. There, I typed it, are you happy now?

I just choose not to give them any more of my money.


>But you thought the trade for that chicken breast was good -
>and since they will not take back breast you munched on,
>they are as free to do with your traded money as they were
>to shoot up their chicken parts as part of Juli 4th fireworks ?
>
>>Corporation money and resources, especially for a corp. that sells a product, are using my money. Granted, 'my money' is a very small part of what the company brings in, but it's still my money. And when the corporation is donating my money to something I disagree with or, in Chik-Fil-A's case, offensive, I choose not to give them my money any more.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> It's when they start applying the corporation money and resources to their causes that I disagree with that I start to have a problem.
>>>>
>>>>I don't care what you say, I care with what you do.
>>>
>>>Why? it is the companies money - shareholders are free to kick CEO or sell their shares.
>>>Or will those actions generate tax breaks, making you pay for their views ?
>>>
>>>curious
>>>
>>>thomas