>>Some wonder if Ryan will show some Palin traits, but mostly thinking while he would make a decent prez
>>in 12 to 20 years it will center too much on the economic while opening up discussion to his radical budget plan.
>>Some respect for Mitt for not choosing a too bland corunner.
>
>Sarah Palin is a loose cannon and not too bright. Neither of those remotely describes Paul Ryan. I think his objectives are despicable but he is dead serious about achieving them. He should be taken seriously.

Palin commented on some issues without knowledge, without thinking and without a staff pulling the switch on the mic.
From everything read here it seems that R&R have both little knowlegde *besides* economic issues.

While focusing on the economic should be first priority, having currently only blunders on foreign issues
might open them up to be sacked - Obama might trump with a few well timed terrorist take outs
and conferences to get him so much free aitrtime even big pockets cannot equalize.

And over here Romney is not *really* taken seriously -
while not openly made fun of as the second coming of the Bush family,
his string of blunders were noted. Although if his description of Ryans next job was a set piece
to joke about his blunders, my estimate of him rises a few notches - beig able to make fun of himself
is a nice trait, esp. in politicians