>>>And I suppose you have some hard evidence that they all were?
>>>
>>>I am not the one making the accusations. I do not need hard evidence of anything.
>>
>>" I do not need hard evidence of anything."
>>
>>Tea Party mantra ...
>
>I have intentional stayed out political discussions, and mostly off the UT for months to avoid the regurgitated discussions just like this one.
>
>Your response caught my eye though - take it out of the emotional political context-- you do realize the problem with your response and the legitimacy of Marcia's, right? One of the hallmarks of the American legal system is the presumption that you are innocent until proven guilty. This isn't just an ideal, it's an actual legal presumption.

I substantially agree with you, although I seem incapable of spitting out the bait ;-)

It is just the usual regurgitation. If there is one good thing to say about it, you have emerged from UT retirement. How's life?