>>>Yeah, I'm being nit-pickish but I'm feeling a wee bit snarky this morning - why do you describe the female side of the equation as, and I paraphrase, "Fat and Black"? What difference does that make in this discussion?
>>>
>>>My point is, you give us, essentially, a resume for Emanuel yet his opponent is "Female, Fat and Black".
>>
>>Suffices to win over Rahmbo (nice nick, though). Fat black lady wins my vote against a sleaze any day.
>
>For the record, "Rahmbo" was not my invention. It does suit him.
>
>I would never describe him as sleazy. He's more a take-no-prisoners kind of guy. He is definitely not one of those Democrats who can be rolled by attack dogs from the other party.

We got opinions, obviously. I remember a few things about him while I was still there, more of an impression than facts, but now reading the same wikipedia, I feel I was on the spot. A bankster, specialized in covering tracks and fundraising (from other banksters) for the political party, which will then find other ways to pour more tax money into banksters' pockets? I wouldn't call that a sleaze if I had the time to find a more appropriate term.