>sigh... if you insist on correcting the thread drift, I'll have to reply to you too :)
>
>The particular issue in this thread is really just one of (lack of) documentation. VFP has tons of examples of inconsistent/weird/unexpected behaviour, but over time, most of it has become documented. Some is officially documented, some only in the various HackFoxes, wikis or forums. Even if it's pretty egregious it doesn't always get corrected. But, as long as it's documented somewhere, we live with it.
As I see it, the particular issue here is not merely lack of documentation. IMO the 'initial value of property' problem is a bug and the documentation is not lacking in this case, unless it should mention bugs too, but that's not what I expect. :)
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
