Hi Thomas,

I've done this; seen no difference in total memory utilization. Have you seen otherwise?

thanks,

Hank

>Nope, vfp is not compiled with that switch. You can patch the exe as it is only an adress,
>You can find programs doing that for you - some even so simple you can follow if running in an interpreter,
>so you won't get a virus. At least compare before and after patching - should be minimal change ;-)
>
>
>>Thanks Craig, so the question is, if I modify the boot.ini with the /3GB flag, does VFP 9 or VFP 9 applications compiled with /LARGEADDRESSAWARE switch?!?
>>
>>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg487508.aspx
>>>
>>>>Sorry but like to jump in here Craig. What happens to the extra 1GB, mine too has 4GB but Windows XP says 3.50GB RAM. Are other apps / utilities able to use this extra RAM? Can we make Windows move the PageFile onto the extra memory (by adding lots more) onto a RAM Drive if it can use beyond that 3/3.5GB RAM?
>>>>
>>>>Please advise
>>>>
>>>>Thanks and regards
>>>>Bhavbhuti