>>The point I was really trying to make was "so what". The idea was to help stop bullying - so if fools think this is just some backhanded plot to turn all of the straight Christian kids into evil flaming gays (which is of course absurd) - so what? And even if it is - so what? Perhaps NOT having your child involved in this is really just a plot to turn all Jewish kids Christian.

Yes, but that inflammatory rhetoric is entirely yours. I didn't see any "fools" saying the intention was to turn Christian kids into evil flaming gays. As you say, that's absurd. The actual complaint was that a certain organization with a particular interest in gay politics was trying to sneak social engineering in under an anti-bullying banner. That's either true or false. If true, then perhaps it doesn't matter what you do or don't think about homosexuality: perhaps what matters is that somebody has tried to use a Trojan horse against kids and their parents. You may see this as a "so what" but others may decide that trying to sneak things past is unacceptable and that Trojan Horses need to be kept outside the gates. Of course it will be a great shame if the anti-bullying horse gets left outside as a result... but whose fault would that be?

I guess I'm saying that it's easy to cast aspersions at others, especially if the labels fit in with a particular prejudice (e.g. anti-religion) but it doesn't hurt to try to look at it from the other side's perspective or even to look in the mirror occasionally.