Similar to my estimates - over here we a acute case plagiarism hunters sniffing through
doctorate thesis of politicians. Had the fastest rising conservative politician cashiered from his ministry post,
a few others returning/being stripped of their doctor graduation.

I am more surprized at the stupidity of the Trump offers terms:
If O really spent "millions of $" to keep his early years private, why should he open them for measely 5Mio to charity ?
Clearly only a publicity stunt for petty cash just in case O decides to show and give Trump a tax deduction -
but why make it so stupid even in the first sentence ?

>I am surprised that there is reluctance to release his transcripts. Admission to Harvard Law School is somewhat selective, and to be admitted five years after finishing undergrad his credentials must have included summa cum out of Columbia and then maxed out LSAT. Unless, of course, he benefited from some some kind of program designed to diversify the student body by admitting somebody raised as white as I was who had a genetically induced tan but could hardly make a case for having overcome inner city urban problems. I think that may be the touchy spot as I am sure it would take about 10 minutes to find 100 people rejected for admission to Harvard Law School in 1988 who would be quite willing to display their LSATs and transcripts and it would not play well politically.,
>
>But, as you say, he did well, so to direct this at him as an issue is silly as he is by any measure a success story.
>
>If he were actually running on his record this stuff would be a non-story. Unfortunately the magic show that promised hope and change seems now to have little to offer but fear and loathing. Quite sad, actually.