>>>>>Let me share with you another personal "spin" :). My brother-in-law is 20 years younger than me. So I have known him since he was in the elementary school. In college he was very liberal (just like most college kids). After college, while at his first job he is still very liberal. My wife and I are laughing amongst ourselves like "give him time he will change." The kid is very hard working and ambitious. He is not happy with what kind of money he is making. So he goes to school for his masters. After masters he gets another job. Still very liberal. Works very hard and still not happy with his financial situation. So he goes to law school at night (borrows money on top of what he already owes for other schools). Make the long story short. He is now a partner in one of the top law firms in Boston. Married to a professional; has two kids. He is now Republican and proudly displays it on his Facebook. So my conclusion is that if a person, by the time they are 35 yo, is still liberal he/she is either socialist or loser <bg>
>>>>
>>>>...and it's thinking like this that cost the Republican's the election...the idea that they're superior and know what's best for everyone and anyone who disagrees is some horrible horrible person that is going to destroy the moral fabric of the whole country....especially if you're not a white christian male. What's even more pathetic is the Republican's still haven't figured this out (or at least are not willing to do anything about it). for example http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/house-committee-chairs-all-white-men_n_2201136.html
>>>
>>>To be fair, House committee chairs are typically chosen based on their seniority on the committee, and most committees don't have Republican women or minorities at senior levels.
>>>
>>>The people's House operates just like every other govenrment agency, thus long serving nitwits are able to remain in powerful leadership positions due solely to their ability to be re-elected in safe gerrymandered districts. ;)
>>>
>>>One could comment on what type of person still notices color and gender rather than most qualified individual but that too would not apply do to seniority crap. ;)
>>
>>Agreed. Thing is the Republican party has jumped up and down screaming how they're 'diverse' and working to become more diverse. They keep saying all these things (like how they will back off abortion topic) - but when it comes right down to it - no diversity (it's even worse than before) and the votes/stance on woman's rights/abortion issues is the same and there is no backing off it either - if anything its also worse than before. So here you have the leaders of the Republican party SAY they believe a,b, and c - say they will do a,b, and c - and at the end of the day - nothing changes - other than more people and politicians flee the party before it completely implodes.
>
>I do see the Republicans trying to make amends with Hispanic-Americans for electoral purposes. Given demographic changes they will remain in the wilderness if they don't. They realize that.

You ever saw politicians do anything NOT for electoral purposes? The Democrats like Hispanic-Americans for ??? :) And remember how Obama was jumping all over NJ during Sandy? Have you seen him there lately? :)