>>>>I'm not on here much anymore, and when I am, I still read much of the same as years gone by. Still, this amazed me. Bizarre situation to say the least! I have no idea what is true and what is not, but all I can say is that looking at past posts, it does appear suspicious.
>>>
>>>Tracy and Mike - I mentioned this to Al Doman at the time : In 2011 Mike posted something about Iran or something related to national security and specifically wanted my reaction. I did not immediately reply and the next day got a private email - not a UT message but an email to the address listed in my profile - quoting Mike's message - from Sophia Gilardi - who at that time had never posted message on UT, was logging in three times a day and with whom I had never had any interaction of any kind.
>>>
>>>I have no idea what that means, but my bullshit detector tells me that SG is not who or what she says she is or if a very very strange person.
>>
>>This is seriously starting to concern me after some recent emails from the woman I believe is Sophia. Not to be histrionic but I am in fear for my life. I am posting this so if something happens to me there will be a trail.
>>
>>Now I am wishing I had a gun (1/2 smile). Not actually feeling jokey at all....
>
>I am not in your shoes - but perhaps I would answer any new mail from that source
>just with a reply that any new mails from her are unwelcome and will not be kept private.
>
>Either forward them to someone trusted or publish them -
>edited for your convinience and privacy, but not rearranged -
>on the net.
>
>But only those pestering after due warning.
>Unless you wrote some mails to her you'd be sorry to see in the open yourself -
>but openness is a good way to stop such stuff.
>
>Keeping stoic here is another good idea.
>
>thumb pressing (german equivalent for american fingers crossed)
>

Thanks, Thomas. I am going to go with stoicism. And I think I was being overly dramatic. For sure I am not planning any more contact with her.