>>The IPCC's AR5 WG draft has been leaked online and there's interesting (read : game changing) news regarding solar forcing.
>>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100194166/man-made-global-warming-even-the-ipcc-admits-the-jig-is-up/
>>
>>Here's a post which contains multiple links to the full draft document.
>>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/13/ipcc-ar5-draft-leaked-contains-game-changing-admission-of-enhanced-solar-forcing/
>>
>>$80 billion & counting spent by US taxpayers on this farce. Money well spent.
>
>I'm confused. It says "The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does NOT seem to account for these observations"

The 1st 4 IPCC reports have stated that natural forcing is small compared to anthropogenic causes. The observance has been based upon only considering TSI forcing in reagrds to solar impact. If TSI forcing "alone does NOT seem to account for"..."Many empirical relationships have been reported between GCR or cosmogenic isotope archives " then there is something else which has not been considered and is not being included in the models.

The bottom line for me is simple. Have a gander at that giant ball of fire in the sky and honestly tell yourself that it's impact on the climate of this planet is minimal compared to a trace gas in our atmosphere. Now consider that for the past 20+ years this "science"-based organization has been telling us the exact opposite.