>>>Okay. Does a reasonable person think any individual civilian needs to own weapons that can fire 10's or 100's of shots per second?
>>
>>The bushmaster can not fire 10s of rounds per second. You should understand what you are talking about before spewing wrong information.
>
>Perhaps. Let me ask you a direct question. Do you think there are weapons that civilians should not be allowed to own? That is, can we find some common ground and work from there?
>
>Tamar

Civilians are not allowed to own full auto weapons (like the press and you keep trying to imply were used in this case), cannons, bombs (larger than fireworks), flamethrowers, etc w/o BATF licensing/fees/background checks/storage requirements/etc.

I don't have a problem with that.