Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Congratulations Illinois - 2nd Amendment Restored
Message
 
To
19/12/2012 08:22:37
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Civil rights
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01559345
Message ID:
01560283
Views:
60
>>>>>Okay. Does a reasonable person think any individual civilian needs to own weapons that can fire 10's or 100's of shots per second?
>>>>
>>>>The bushmaster can not fire 10s of rounds per second. You should understand what you are talking about before spewing wrong information.
>>>
>>>Perhaps. Let me ask you a direct question. Do you think there are weapons that civilians should not be allowed to own? That is, can we find some common ground and work from there?
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>Civilians are not allowed to own full auto weapons (like the press and you keep trying to imply were used in this case), cannons, bombs (larger than fireworks), flamethrowers, etc w/o BATF licensing/fees/background checks/storage requirements/etc.
>>
>>I don't have a problem with that.
>
>Great, common ground.
>
>To work from the other end, I don't have a problem with people owning hunting rifles and other weapons clearly intended for hunting or for the work of ranching and farming. (You have a vocabulary advantage here. I don't know, nor do I particularly want to know, the names of different kinds of guns.) I'm also not opposed to those living in isolated places having appropriate guns to protect themselves from dangerous animals.
>
>Can we find any more common ground? I'm open to hearing why individuals should have guns in other situations. Are you open to the possibility that there might be other weapons that shouldn't be in private ownership?
>
>Tamar

Defense. I'll consider disarming when the government guarantees and absolutely demonstrates with no exceptions that I, my family, friends, and neighbors will never face a situation where someone is attempting to do us bodily harm - ever.

Other than that, I will exercise my right of self defense.

If I am put into a situation where I have to defend myself or someone else, I'll use the quickest and most effective means to do so. I'm not going to try to counsel whomever threatens me. I'm not going to wait for the gub-mint to rescue me (see recent massacres - that's worked real well). I'm not going to fight fair if I can help it.

If others like yourself want to be victims instead, that is your right.
____________________________________

Don't Tread on Me

Overthrow the federal government NOW!
____________________________________
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform